09.02 Autonomous Control Features - Quiz¶
Section 9.2 Quiz: Autonomous control features
-
What characterizes Level 2 (Partial Autonomy) in mechatronic systems?
- The system requires human control for every action
- The system can handle routine operations independently while being supervised by humans {data-correct}
- The system operates completely without any human oversight
- The system only provides basic assistance to human operators
-
Which of the following is the best example of a Level 4 (High Autonomy) system?
- A remote-controlled robot arm
- An automatic door that opens when motion is detected
- An industrial robot that can adapt to different part sizes and orientations {data-correct}
- A simple automated thermostat
-
What is the primary purpose of safety interlocks in autonomous systems?
- To make the system run faster
- To prevent dangerous operations by automatically checking safety conditions {data-correct}
- To reduce the cost of the system
- To improve the user interface
-
What should a well-designed fallback system do when the primary action fails?
- Immediately shut down the entire system
- Try alternative approaches before requesting human assistance {data-correct}
- Ignore the failure and continue with the original plan
- Always return to the starting position
-
In the cleaning robot example, what happens when the autonomy level is set to 0?
- The robot cleans automatically using advanced algorithms
- The robot waits for human commands before taking any action {data-correct}
- The robot only cleans in emergencies
- The robot operates at maximum speed
-
Which safety check should have the HIGHEST priority in an autonomous system?
- Battery level monitoring
- Obstacle detection
- Emergency stop status {data-correct}
- Cleaning efficiency
-
What is a key advantage of implementing multiple autonomy levels in a mechatronic system?
- It makes the system more expensive
- It allows the system to adapt to different situations and user requirements {data-correct}
- It reduces the need for safety features
- It eliminates the need for human oversight
-
When designing fallback actions for “move_forward” in a robot, which sequence makes the most sense?
- stop_immediately → request_human_help → emergency_shutdown
- reduce_speed → find_alternate_path → stop_and_wait → request_human_help {data-correct}
- increase_speed → try_jumping → call_emergency_services
- ignore_obstacle → continue_forward → hope_for_best